The Next Big Boom in Civil Aviation: A study of the constantly changing airline industry in China

Preface

The airline industry has been an interest and a passion of mine since I was a young child. Growing up in New York, I was able to experience, first hand, some major developments in the industry. I was there when the Pan Am Building became the Met Life Building; “World’s most experienced airline” ceased operations in the early 1990s. New York was Pan Am’s main hub city and world headquarters for decades; the airline was brought down after fighting to survive for over a decade following deregulation.

New York has also been home to many airline industry experiments during my lifetime. I remember taking flights on TowerAir during the 1990s; TowerAir began service from New York shortly after deregulation. With a fleet made up entirely of old 747s, packed with as many economy seats as could fit, TowerAir operated short-haul, and intercontinental flights with “no-frills” service. This airline eventually failed after it gained a reputation for putting profit before safety. Around the time TowerAir ceased operations, JetBlue Airways initiated operations from New York. JetBlue’s approach to cost-savings differed from TowerAir, as JetBlue set out to provide service while keeping its passengers interests in high regard. JetBlue is still thriving today.

My experiences with the airline industry from living in New York are valuable; New York is a very competitive market for airlines and success does not come easily, if at all. The airline industry in the United States, in general, is very mature and established, and still, lessons continue to be learned.

Why the Global Change in Nitrogen Should Concern Us

The global change in carbon dioxide (CO2) has received considerable attention from the scientific and policy communities worldwide. Global warming, sea level rise, and changes in Earth’s patterns of precipitation are all now well recognized to be related to the changes in CO2 in the atmosphere. Scientists and policy makers have focused considerable effort in understanding the extent to which the change in CO2 may be related to man’s activities. From the efforts of thousands of individual scientists to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize with Al Gore, the consensus is overwhelming that man’s activities have resulted in an acceleration of the change in carbon in the Earth’s atmosphere. However, while media attention has been focused on global changes due to carbon, changes have occurred in another element, nitrogen, and these changes also have large global consequences. Nitrogen is a neighbor to carbon on the periodic table of elements and can be considered the secondary building block of life. The purpose of this paper is to describe how global nitrogen has been changed by man’s activities, and why, like carbon, it needs to be considered in the global change discussion.

Dear Readers

It is with great pleasure that I introduce you to the third edition of the Hobart and William Smith Colleges Public Affairs Journal. This edition is of particular importance for many reasons, but perhaps the most significant aspect of the third edition is our continued commitment to open dialogue about civic engagement and public policy by beginning a bi-annual release of the Journal. In this sense, releasing a new edition twice a year instead of just once should allow readers and writers to analyze a wider array of ideas, thus allowing for a more engaged and more informed debate about public affairs.

For this edition, we invited submissions from a diverse community of institutions. Between these covers lies the work of students from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, the University of Pennsylvania, the University of Wisconsin-Madison, Columbia University, and, of course, Hobart and William Smith Colleges. To cap off this wonderful array of diverse pieces, an introduction by Adam Nagourney, a journalist who primarily covers U.S. politics for The New York Times, sheds light on the role of journalism in the public realm.

On behalf of the Public Affairs Journal staff, I would like to invite you to probe the contents of the Journal, and examine, question, and discuss the issues presented in the articles. Beginning an informed debate about public affairs, as is the primary goal of the Journal, can empower us all to contribute in meaningful ways to the future.

An introduction to the third issue of the HWS Public Affairs Journal

First, thank you for opening your pages to me. I am the chief political reporter of the New York Times. This would, to put it mildly, be a pretty cool job any time. It is amazingly cool this year.


My job is, with a team of other reporters, to write about national elections. This year, it is to chronicle the presidential campaign. My goal, in short, is to make certain that by Election Day, readers of the New York Times have enough information about the candidates – their views, record in government, biography, and character – to make an informed decision about who to support on Election Day.

There are all kinds of ways we try to accomplish this, both in the newspaper but also on our Web site. The first task is to chronicle the story of the campaign itself. This means following the rise (and fall) of various candidates; identifying issues and concerns that appear to be critical to candidates and voters; writing about various states and why they are important to the nominating process; and identifying voting or demographic trends that could affect the outcome of the race. It means exploring differences among the candidates on all the major issues to get at what they would do as president (and in some cases, it means pointing out when candidates’ views have, shall we say, evolved over the years).

For me, this could mean spending a month in Iowa – which I did – reporting all the preparations leading up to the caucuses. It could mean spending a few days following a candidate around, reporting what they are saying and how they are presenting themselves to voters, and what kind of reception they are getting. What are voters asking about? What are the candidates talking about? Are they saying one thing in one part of a state and something else somewhere else?

Syndicate content